About
I am me.. and that’s me….
I don’t believe in stories… so i dont believe in any religion….
I don’t believe in a Supreme Being…. that will be GOD….
I don’t like politics….
I don’t like terrorists and politicians (Arent they the real terrorists???
Well thats a start… I will write more about myself soon…
Nov 19, 2011 @ 22:56:30
Just was glancing few articles & came across your webpage. Ur photograhy r amazing. If u dont mind can i ask you if the “A” in ur website stands for you being an Atheist???
Nov 20, 2011 @ 18:15:15
Thanks for the compliments!
Yes, the ‘A’ is for atheists but I am not an atheist. The reason it is there is because I share a lot of their views. Even if some of my posts seem like I am criticizing religions that is not my intent, it is just to show the bad part or my point of view.
Nov 20, 2011 @ 20:41:30
Interesting Indeed!!!
Which part of the world are you from? What do you do for a living?
I am an Indian. I am an entrepreneur having my own chain of cafes.
I was actually searching for visual matrix & came across your webpage.
Got toally diverted & sat to read your articles!!!!
Nov 21, 2011 @ 15:41:53
Mr. Truth: This is for you
)))
WHO MADE US?????,frequently asked by everyone………………….
Dr.Laurence B. Brown, MD clarifies it!!!!
At some point in our lives, everybody asks the big questions: “Who made us,” and “Why are we here?”
…
So who did make us? Most of us have been brought up more on science than religion, and to believe in the Big Bang and evolution more than God. But which makes more sense? And is there any reason why the theories of science and creationism cannot coexist?
The Big Bang may explain the origin of the universe, but it doesn’t explain the origin of the primordial dust cloud. This dust cloud (which, according to the theory, drew together, compacted and then exploded) had to come from somewhere. After all, it contained enough matter to form not just our galaxy, but the billion other galaxies in the known universe. So where did that come form? Who, or what, created the primordial dust cloud?
Similarly, evolution may explain the fossil record, but it falls far short of explaining the quintessential essence of human life the soul. We all have one. We feel its presence, we speak of its existence and at times pray for its salvation. But only the religious can explain where it came from. The theory of natural selection can explain many of the material aspects of living things, but it fails to explain the human soul.
Furthermore, anyone who studies the complexities of life and the universe cannot help but witness the signature of the Creator. Whether or not people recognize these signs is another matter as the old saying goes, denial isn’t just a river in Egypt. (Get it? Denial, spelled “de Nile” … the river Ni … oh, never mind.) The point is that if we see a painting, we know there is a painter. If we see a sculpture, we know there’s a sculptor; a pot, a potter. So when we view creation, shouldn’t we know there’s a Creator?
The concept that the universe exploded and then developed in balanced perfection through random events and natural selection is little different from the proposal that, by dropping bombs into a junkyard, sooner or later one of them will blow everything together into a perfect Mercedes.
If there is one thing we know for certain, it is that without a controlling influence, all systems degenerate into chaos. The theories of the Big Bang and evolution propose the exact opposite, however that chaos fostered perfection. Would it not be more reasonable to conclude that the Big Bang and evolution were controlled events? Controlled, that is, by the Creator?
The Bedouin of Arabia tell the tale of a nomad finding an exquisite palace at an oasis in the middle of an otherwise barren desert. When he asks how it was built, the owner tells him it was formed by the forces of nature. The wind shaped the rocks and blew them to the edge of this oasis, and then tumbled them together into the shape of the palace. Then it blew sand and rain into the cracks to cement them together. Next, it blew strands of sheep’s wool together into rugs and tapestries, stray wood together into furniture, doors, windowsills and trim, and positioned them in the palace at just the right locations. Lightning strikes melted sand into sheets of glass and blasted them into the window-frames, and smelted black sand into steel and shaped it into the fence and gate with perfect alignment and symmetry. The process took billions of years and only happened at this one place on earth purely through coincidence.
When we finish rolling our eyes, we get the point. Obviously, the palace was built by design, not by happenstance. To what (or more to the point, to Whom), then, should we attribute the origin of items of infinitely greater complexity, such as our universe and ourselves?
Another argument to dismiss the concept of Creationism focuses upon what people perceive to be the imperfections of creation. These are the “How can there be a God if such-and-such happened?” arguments. The issue under discussion could be anything from a natural disaster to birth defects, from genocide to grandma’s cancer. That’s not the point. The point is that denying God based upon what we perceive to be injustices of life presumes that a divine being would not have designed our lives to be anything other than perfect, and would have established justice on Earth.
Hmm … is there no other option?
We can just as easily propose that God did not design life on Earth to be paradise, but rather a test, the punishment or rewards of which are to be had in the next life, which is where God establishes His ultimate justice. In support of this concept we can well ask who suffered more injustices in their worldly lives than God’s favorites, which is to say the prophets? And who do we expect to occupy the highest stations in paradise, if not those who maintain true faith in the face of worldly adversity? So suffering in this worldly life does not necessarily translate into God’s disfavor, and a blissful worldly life does not necessarily translate into beatitude in the hereafter.
I would hope that, by this line of reasoning, we can agree upon the answer to the first “big question.” Who made us? Can we agree that if we are creation, God is the Creator?
Nov 20, 2011 @ 22:30:33
I too am from India. I am a safety guy by profession but many other things by passion!
Nov 21, 2011 @ 10:46:49
ok Good! Nice to read your blog Mr. Truth.
What religion do you follow?
I am a Muslim & I strongly believe in the existence of God & His Book!!
Nov 21, 2011 @ 20:45:56
I see your previous comment, to tell you the truth if you go through the last two posts in this blog you should be able to get a lot of answers.
If you have not already seen the series ‘Curiosity’ on Discovery, try it. There is an episode done by Stephen Hawkins and he gives a rational explanation of the creation of the universe to include the most basic thing we call ‘matter’. His idea is just an idea no specific scientific research that proves his claim, it is just as what a theist does i.e. speculate. His idea is a little hard to grasp unless you understand Quantum physics but the program on TV tries to simplify it for the laymen but still understanding the concept needs an open mind.
Yes, I was born a Muslim and that is not something that I chose, it is something that was enforced on me based on what my family believes in! So, if you ask me what I am or what faith I follow the answer is; I am a human being and that’s it!
Nov 21, 2011 @ 21:24:29
What does your family say to you? Do they follow Islam & pray to God?
What about your spouse (if you are married)? Will he/she accept you?
What about your kids- will you tell me not to preach or pray to any Power??
I am just curious!! Sorry about that. I hope you are not offended by these qsns
Nov 21, 2011 @ 22:09:05
I do not discuss this with distant relatives as well as with my deeply faithful relatives. My close family knows and accepts it. Yes my family and relatives practice their faith like every other person of faith!
My spouse knows my ‘stand’ on this issue and accepts me. I do not interfere my spouses belief.
However I do not intend to teach my child any religion but I do intend to teach my child morality (and this could be anything i.e., socially right or some good stuff I can retrieve from any religious text/teachings). When my child is old enough to understand what a religion is he/she can choose what religion he/she wishes or abstain completely. I am 100% against child indoctrination in to religions purely based on the fact that he/she gets one particular religion based on his or her parents.
I am not offended and I hope you are not offended.
I am an easy going totally chilled out person. I do not take offense too often